Backport of Update the docs for tfstack config output blocks into v1.10 #36355
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ly-guided-labrador
rkoron007
deleted the
backport/nf/jan25-tfstack-output-docs/exactly-guided-labrador
branch
Contributor
Author
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport
This PR is auto-generated from #36339 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label 1.10-backport.
The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.
The docs for the variant of the
outputblock available in tfstack configurations were wrong — here's the fix.To verify the schema for yourself, check its definition at the bottom of
internal/stacks/stackconfig/output_value.goin this repo. (I also ran an experiment to make sure, and yep: sensitive is supported as optional, and type is mandatory.)Q for education team reviewers: which branch is the web version of these docs sourced from? Does it come straight out of main?
Target Release
1.11.x
CHANGELOG entry
Overview of commits
8152716
e5891b0